Tags
webcam vindaloo vim version vegan unix unicef trojan todo tmux thinkpad textmate testing tagging syntax svn sugar subversion stubbing sphinx spam spaces solaris sitemap site sinatra shoulda sheet set security search schema_info SchemaInfo ruby rinari restaurant relationships refresh rdiff-backup ramaze railsconf08 railsconf07 rails protools production power placeboeffect pink floyd PIC perl overheat outbreak osx os x NYHS NYC nginx netbeans nested nanophotonics mysql music MPEG-4 mongrel model migration microvolunteer macbook mac logrotate logic log linux less leopard keynote JAX javascript java jacksonville iterm2 iterm imunizator highlighting hanna Handbrake haml hacks google geocoding genghistron gem gaming gabrielle's funny functional fun friends food fixesThe Hacker said over 3 years ago permalink Comment? (0)
Tagged: rails security relationships activerecord
ActiveRecord.update_attributes has_many :security_holes, :through => :unkown_features
Among you railites who have successfully learned rails, watched tutorials, and generally feel comfortable about your abilities: Probably didn’t know there is a little security hole in your app.
It has to deal with update_attributes, has_many relationships, and a method made available on the parent in the relation.
Example:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :groups end
In your view you have your pretty form with user’s name and other demographics they can enter in their profile. and a ‘save’ button that leads to a call to ‘update_attributes’.
The problem lies in the fact that has_many creates a method off your object called
user.group_ids=
Which allows you to pass in an array of ids and create associations en-mass.
the problem is that I can come in with firebug and add my own fields.
<!-- im in your html source adding my inputs --> <input type="text" name="user[group_ids][]"/> <input type="text" name="user[group_ids][]"/> <input type="text" name="user[group_ids][]"/>
After filling those fields and submiting, if you inspect the params hash you will notice:
- “parent” => {…. “association_ids” => [“1”,“2”,“4”]}
And if you check your script/console and check the associations, they will be there assuming you have groups with id’s of 1,2, and 4.
The implications? If you use these groups for any kind of role based access, a user could assume a group with root/super/power user access!
The lesson?
Protect your attributes!
attr_protected :group_ids
But! a better idea would be to use:
attr_accessible :name, :bio, :etc
I hope this has helped you as much as it did me!
-TheHacker